By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Pregnancy

Caffeinated beverage and soda consumption and time to pregnancy

E E Hatch et al, 2012
Epidemiology, published online ahead of print
March 13, 2012

Background:

Many epidemiologic studies have evaluated the association between caffeine and fertility, with inconsistent results. Some studies suggest that various caffeine-containing beverages may affect fertility differently.

Methods:

We evaluated the relation of caffeine, coffee, tea, and sodas with time to pregnancy in a prospective cohort study of 3628 women planning a pregnancy, in Denmark (2007–2010). Women reported beverage intake at baseline and every 8 weeks during follow-up until they became pregnant or for up to 12 cycles. We used discrete-time Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), controlling for potential confounders.

Results:

There was little relation between fecundability and caffeine intake of 300+ mg/day compared with >100 mg/day (FR = 1.04 [95% CI  = 0.90 –1.21]) or coffee intake of 3+ servings/day compared with none (1.05 [0.85–1.33]). Soda consumption was associated with reduced fecundability: for all types of sodas combined, the adjusted FRs were 0.89 (0.80–0.98), 0.85 (0.71–1.02), 0.84 (0.57– 1.25), and 0.48 (0.21–1.13) for <1, 1, 2, and 3+ servings per day, respectively, compared with none. Tea drinking was associated with a slight increase in fecundability, with FR =1.27 (0.98 –1.64) for 2+ servings/day versus none.

Conclusion:

In this prospective study of time to pregnancy, the association between caffeine intake and fertility differed by beverage type. Although we controlled for many confounders, our findings of reduced fecundability among soda drinkers and increased fecundability among tea drinkers could have resulted from confounding by unmeasured lifestyle characteristics.

(Epidemiology 2012;23: 000–000)

More research

All research